AYERS v. RAILROAD

Whether a plaintiff who was injured while attempting to load milk-cans upon a slowly moving train was guilty of contributory negligence, is a question for the jury.

BLODGETT, J.

It would serve no useful purpose to comment upon evidence such as appears in this case.

The defendants' motions and requests were properly denied. Lyman v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 200, 204; Foss v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 256, 260; Felch v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 318, 320, 322, 323; Boothby v. Railway, 66 N.H. 342; Walker v. Railroad, 64 N.H. 414; Paine v. Railway, 63 N.H. 623; Merrill v. Express Co., 62 N.H. 514; Nutter v. Railroad, 60 N.H. 483, 485; Tuttle v. Farmington, 58 N.H. 13, 14; Griffin v. Auburn, 58 N.H. 121, 134; Paine v. Railway, 58 N.H. 611; Gilman v. Noyes, 57 N.H. 627; Sleeper v. Sandown, 52 N.H. 244; Cheshire Railroad v. Foster, 51 N.H. 490, 493; Page v. Parker, 43 N.H. 363; Palmer v. Portsmouth, 43 N.H. 365.

Exceptions overruled.

WALLACE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.