DICKEY v. RAILROAD

Whether a railroad crossing over a highway should be covered with snow to put it into a reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use is a question of fact.

CHASE, J.

It was the duty of the defendants to keep the highway crossing in a reasonably safe and convenient condition for public use. P.S., c. 159, s. 1; Concord v. Railroad, 69 N.H. 87. Whether it should have been covered with snow to put it into such condition is a question of fact. Boothby v. Railway, 66 N.H. 342.

Case discharged.

All concurred.