- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
WHITE v. DAKIN
Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.
Jun 1, 1900
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PEASLEE, J.
There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusion would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N.H. 285, 288, et seq.
The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N.H. 460.
Exceptions overruled.
YOUNG, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.