Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WHITE v. DAKIN

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.
Jun 1, 1900
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PEASLEE, J.

There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusion would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N.H. 285, 288, et seq.

The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N.H. 460.

Exceptions overruled.

YOUNG, J., did not sit: the others concurred.