WILSON v. RAILWAY COMPANY

Messrs. B.L. Abney and E.M. Thomson, for appellant, submit their argument in Easler v. this defendant, post. Messrs. G.T. Graham and P.H. Nelson, contra, cite: Is the order now appealable: 35 S.E.R., 797; 32 S.E.R., 417; 30 S.E.R., 614. The Court has no power to subject a party to such examination: 11 Sup. Ct. R., 1001; 113 U.S. 724; 4 How., 242; 24 Pa. St., 314; 29 Hun., 154; 50 N Y Sup. Ct., 412; 53 Mo., 509; 102 Ill., 272; 10 F.R., 278; 40 A.R., 1114; 32 N.E., 389; 33 N.E., 951; 28 N.E., 360. In States where statutes permit such orders they are only granted along with an order requiring examination of party orally: 27 N.Y.S., 966; 34 N.Y.S., 572. There is no statute here permitting such examination, but the contrary: Code, 390.