WILLIAMS v. BANK

Usury.

The question in this case of double the amount of interest paid under an usurious contract controlled by the decision of Ervin v. Bank, ante, 42.

The pleadings and facts are in all material respects like those in Ervin v. Bank, ante, 42, except in this case the referee credited the plaintiff with $170.31, the item in controversy, instead of with double the amount paid, as he did in the Ervin case. His Honor sustained an exception to allowing the amount, $170.31, as a credit, and the plaintiff excepted and appealed from the judgment rendered.