TUCKER v. WEATHERSBEE

Mr. G.M. Greene, for appellant, submits: Burden of proof was shifted to wife to show that property conveyed to her was paid for with funds belonging to her separate estate: 1 Moore, Fraud. Conv., p. 39, sec. 6; 94 U.S. 580; 27 S.C. 425. Grantee knew of her husband's intent in making conveyances: Bump. Fraud. Conv. (4th ed.), sec. 2; 2 Bail. 324; 1 Hill 380; 97 S.C. 31. Burden also on grantee to show that creditor had notice of facts to put him on notice more than six years before action: 8 Rich. Eq. 155; Smith on Frauds, sec. 87; 101 U.S. 135; 44 S.C. 381. Evidence of grantee's knowledge of fraud: 4 S.C. 249. Laches: 2 S.C. 148; 6 S.C. 66; 10 S.C. 261; Smith on Frauds, sec. 249. Messrs. Hendersons and Bates Simms, for respondents, cite: As to limitation of action: 77 S.C. 541; 101 U.S. 135. Laches: McM. Eq. 134; 24 S.C. 99; 21 S.C. 124; 93 U.S. 55.