GOODMAN v. THE STATE

1. — Robbery — Indictment.

Where, upon trial of robbery, the indictment followed approved precedent, the same was sufficient.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, the indictment being sufficient, the judgment must be affirmed.

PRENDERGAST, PRESIDING JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with firearms and his punishment assessed at ninety-nine years in the penitentiary.

The indictment was good and followed the statute and approved form. Green v. State, 66 Tex.Crim. Rep., 147 S.W. Rep., 593; Bell v. State, 176 S.W. Rep., recently decided.

There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.