- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HULME v. DUNLAVEY ET AL
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Jul 27, 1915
APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Necessity. Where plaintiff in error has failed to file brief as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 187 Pac. ix), and offered no excuse for such failure, the cause will be dismissed.
(Syllabus by McKeown, C.)
Opinion by McKEOWN, C.
The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 27, 1913. Neither party has filed a brief, nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. It is evident that the appeal has been abandoned, and the motion of defendant in error to dismiss will be sustained, and cause dismissed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).
By the Court: It is so ordered.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.