Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. ROSE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
May 1, 1917

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Held, that the remarks touching the failure of the defendant to testify in his own behalf, attributed to the district attorney, although highly reprehensible, were not prejudicial to the defendant, in view of the clear evidence of the defendant's guilt, and the prompt instruction by the trial judge to the jury to disregard such remarks. All concurred.