TAYLOR v. MANNING

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for the reason that the learned trial justice erred in sustaining the objections to defendant's testimony of his transactions and conversations with Armstrong, culminating at folio 180, and because in the absence of the books of the bankrupt corporation concerning which the alleged false statements were made, there was no legal proof of fraudulent representations. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.