- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
LAMPKIN v. THOMAS
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Dec 23, 1918
SOMERVILLE, J.
Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.
Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.
Corrected and affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.