WRIGHT v. WAGGONER

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

Where no briefs are filed, as required by rule 7 (47 Okla. vi; 165 Pac. vii) of the Supreme Court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

HIGGINS, J.

This cause was submitted April 20, 1920. In accordance with a stipulation duly filed plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days from that date within which to file their brief. On May 26, thereafter, plaintiffs in error were granted a further extension of 30 days. No briefs having been filed in the cause within the extensions of time granted and no further time having been requested (47 Okla. vi; 165 Pac. vii), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 P. 880; Cantwell v. Patterson, 71 Oklahoma, 174 P. 754; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 P. 10.

RAINEY, C. J., and HARRISON, KANE. PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, BAILEY, and COLLIER, JJ., concur.