- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
WYNNS v. R. R
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1921
PER CURIAM.
Upon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor's refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury, under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N.C. 38.
No error.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.