- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MARGOLIS v. PINNAS
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Apr 11, 1924
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.