Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MARGOLIS v. PINNAS

Court of Errors and Appeals.
Apr 11, 1924

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.