ANTLEY et al. v. ANTLEY et al

Messrs. Adam H. Moss and P.F. Haigler and Nimocks Nimocks, for appellants, cite: No granting clause in deed: 39 S.C. 271; Rule in Shelley's Case; 36 S.C. 354, 356; 67 S.C. 130. Rule not applicable: 1 Strob. Eq., 346; 3 Rich. Eq., 550; 116 S.C. 229; 16 S.C. 290; 16 S.C. 303; 83 S.C. 265. Intention of grantor given effect: 102 S.C. 227. Messrs. Wolfe Berry and J. LeRoy Dukes, for respondents, cite: Intention a term of art: 106 S.C. 306. Words conveying fee simple: 102 S.C. 361. Words conveying fee conditional: 98 S.C. 460; 115 S.E., 605. Rights under fee conditional: 10 R.C.L., 654; 98 S.C. 461; 16 S.C.L. (Harp. L.), 92; 26 S.C. Eq. (5 Rich. Eq.), 441; 98 S.C. 461. "Bodily issue" and "children" distinguished: 115 S.E., 606; 83 S.C. 265; 3 Rich. Eq., 271; 67 S.C. 307; 16 S.C. 290; 10 S.C. 414. Limitation after fee void: 115 S.E., 606; 109 S.C. 58; 106 S.C. 304; 93 S.C. 266; 76 S.C. 36; 76 S.C. 484; 5 Rich Eq., 356; 46 S.C. 267. Condition burdening fee discharged: 116 S.C. 127. Cases distinguished: 116 S.C. 233; 24 S.C. 228.