CRAWFORD v. EL PASO SASH DOOR CO

Deed Intended as Mortgage — Charge.

The ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals herein (El Paso Sash Door Co. v. Crawford, 283 S.W. 232) that the charge submitting the issue whether a deed was intended as a mortgage was erroneous, is disapproved; but the judgment being properly reversed for other errors, application for writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (P. 509).

PER CURIAM:

We do not approve the holding on the question that it was necessary to charge the legal effect of the deed under the issue made in this case; but the case having been properly reversed ( 283 S.W. 232), we will dismiss the application for want of jurisdiction.