JAMES v. UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U.S., 150 U.S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affecting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U.S., 142 U.S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.