Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LLOYD v. WEINSTOCK

Court of Errors and Appeals.
May 16, 1927

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.