- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
CAVANAUGH v. CONNECTICUT CO
Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, October Term, 1929.
Mar 3, 1930
PER CURIAM.
We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York, N. H. H.R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 A. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. Connecticut Co., ante, p. 625, 149 A. 127, that the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.