JAMES RADCLIFFE SONS CO. v. KNOBLE

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N.J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.