- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
CHIAPELLA v. COUNTY NAT. BANK ETC. CO
Supreme Court of California.In Bank.
Mar 7, 1933
THE COURT.
The lower court dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction.
[1] A suit upon a rejected claim is not an exercise of probate jurisdiction. The action is upon the contract and venue is determined as in other civil cases. ( McLean v. Crow, 88 Cal. 644, 647 [26 P. 596]; Gallagher v. McGraw, 132 Cal. 601 [ 26 P. 596].) Such a suit is also recognized as a transitory action. It follows the person of the defendant and may be tried in a county other than that wherein the estate is being probated. ( Thompson v. Wood, 115 Cal. 301 [ 64 P. 1080].)
The order is affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.