CAMPBELL et al. v. WILLIAMS et al

Messrs. Cantey Elliott, for appellant, cite: Issue is word of limitation not of purchase: 83 S.C. 265; 65 S.E., 241. As to rule in Shelley's case: 52 S.C. 554; 30 S.E., 400; 76 S.C. 39; 56 S.E., 546; 76 S.C. 488; 57 S.E., 614; 102 S.C. 7; 86 S.E., 211. Messrs. T.C. Brown, Heyward Brockinton, Waller Bailey and Charles B. Elliott, for respondents, cite: Fee-simple conditional estate: 3 Rich. Eq., 271; 1 Brevard, 331; 5 Rich. Eq., 441; 14 S.C. 597; 16 S.C. 312. Issue defined: 83 S.C. 265; 2 Hill Law, 42; 7 Rich. Eq., 264; 10 S.C. 426; 16 S.C. 312. Where rule in Shelley's case does not apply: 1 N. McC., 69; 2 McCord, 335; Bailey's Eq., 37, 42, 292, 390, 536; 1 Rich. Eq., 79; 1 Rich., 265; 1 Strob. Eq., 193; 4 Rich. Eq., 263; 7 Rich. Eq., 407; 16 S.C. 294; 27 S.C. 480; 28 S.C. 495; 67 S.C. 130; 45 S.E., 137; 42 S.E., 342; 20 S.E., 161. Word heirs used in the sense of children it is word of purchase and not of limitation: 76 S.C. 484; 57 S.E., 614; 102 S.C. 7; 91 S.C. 300; 74 S.E., 374; 107 S.E., 914; 29 S.C. 135; 7 S.E., 53; 123 S.C. 371; 10 S.C. 376.