Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

CASAVALO v. D'AURIA

Court of Errors and Appeals.
Sep 27, 1934

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 8.

For reversal — PERSKIE, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 3.