- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BEIKIRCH v. LOEBS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Mar 1, 1935
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that respondent's petition reveals present knowledge by him of facts sufficient to formulate the cause of action which he claims. While an examination under rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice may be had to facilitate the accurate pleading of a known cause of action, it will not be allowed to enable plaintiff to ascertain whether facts exist sufficient to create a cause of action. All concur. (The order granted an examination of defendants before trial to enable plaintiff to frame a complaint in a libel action.)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.