Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF KAVESH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 25, 1936
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

James Lipsig, for the appellant Socialist Party "Opposition Group." Seymour B. Quel of counsel [ Paxton Blair and Russell Lord Tarbox with him on the brief; Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel], for the appellant Board of Elections of the City of New York. Matthew M. Levy of counsel [ David Halper, Samuel Bobrowsky and Sidney Markowitz with him on the brief], for the petitioner-respondent.

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

The failure to comply with section 142 of the Election Law by petitioner-respondent in filing objections and proper specifications to the designating petitions, in so far as such objections appear on the face of the petition, precludes a review because of such failure of compliance. The record does not contain any proof upon which the court in the exercise of its summary jurisdiction might find the designating petitions defective.

On the state of the record, the order should be reversed in so far as appealed from and the petition denied.

PER CURIAM.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed and petition denied.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x