Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SCATA, BOLOGNIA, DiDONNE, ZIZZO, KIMMEL

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Nov 17, 1936

As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed. The error in the judge's charge as to the effect of a promise by the Assistant District Attorney did not in our opinion affect the substantial right of the defendants. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and FINCH, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Kimmel, Bruno and Zizzo; LEHMAN and LOUGHRAN, JJ.