- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SCATA, BOLOGNIA, DiDONNE, ZIZZO, KIMMEL
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Nov 17, 1936
As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed. The error in the judge's charge as to the effect of a promise by the Assistant District Attorney did not in our opinion affect the substantial right of the defendants. No opinion.
Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and FINCH, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Kimmel, Bruno and Zizzo; LEHMAN and LOUGHRAN, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.