- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HIRSH v. CENTRAL HANOVER BANK TRUST CO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May 7, 1937
PER CURIAM.
The complaint states a sufficient cause of action at law though not in equity. Consequently, an answer having been interposed, the court should not have dismissed the complaint. ( Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kraemer v. World Wide Trading Co., Inc., 195 id. 305.)
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
PER CURIAM.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.