Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WARD ET AL. v. GARVIN

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 3, 1938
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Negligence — Physicians — Mistake in diagnosis.

A physician is not responsible merely for an error of judgment or a mistake of diagnosis in the treatment of a patient.

Argued December 9, 1937.

PER CURIAM, January 3, 1938:

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek recovery of damages from defendant, a physician, upon a claim that he made a mistake in diagnosing an injury to the wife's foot. The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it refused to take off, relying upon our decisions, the latest of which is Duckworth v. Bennett, 320 Pa. 47, 181 A. 558, where we held that a physician is not responsible for an error of judgment or a mistake in diagnosis in the treatment of a patient. The action of the court below was correct.

Judgment affirmed.