Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

EGAN v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Oct 7, 1938
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: On sufficient evidence, the court below found that the State Police sergeant failed to make a reasonably careful examination of the Egan car to determine whether it was the one for which he was looking, failed to inform the claimants that he was a police officer and of the nature of the charge against them, before he attempted to place them under arrest, and that he was negligent in these particulars. Unless a felony is being committed in his presence, a peace officer, who attempts to make an arrest without a warrant, must disclose his authority and inform the person to be arrested of the nature of the charge against him. (Code Crim. Proc. ยง 180; People v. Marendi, 213 N.Y. 600, 609.) The facts as found bring these cases within the provisions of sections 12-a CTC and 26 CTC of the Court of Claims Act. ( Kline v. State of New York, 253 App. Div. 788; affd., 278 N.Y. 615.) All concur. (The judgment awards claimant damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of an assault by a member of the State Police.)