Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE v. LINARDUCCI

Court of Errors and Appeals.
Sep 22, 1939

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.