- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. LINARDUCCI
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Sep 22, 1939
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.