- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF TURCHIN v. WARTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Nov 1, 1940
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM.
The motion should have been granted, for the reasons that the chattel when mortgaged was situated in the city of New York, and the mortgagor was a resident of Westchester county, State of New York. Therefore, the mortgage should have been filed in the county of Westchester as well as in the county where the chattel was located. (See Lien Law, ยงยง 230 and 232.)
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.