HART v. CITY OF CHICAGO

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 117.6 — sufficiency of evidence of negligent injury to pedestrian. Where plaintiff was out in the street a ways preparing to cross over at a point not a cross walk and she saw a car under the control of defendant's servant stopped near the curb, and in parking, defendant's car was backed up on her without warning to her injury, as to a contention that plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care for her own safety, a verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Opinion by JUSTICE FRIEND.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 19, 1942.