- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BERWIN v. NEWMAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 28, 1944
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for examination before trial of defendants in all respects denied, with leave to plaintiff to renew after service of reply, as directed in companion appeal decided herewith ( Berwin v. Newman, post, p. 815). The examination of the defendants resident in California should be by commission (see Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 262 App. Div. 708) and confined to matters material and necessary to establish plaintiff's right to an accounting, unless additional matters pleaded in the reply justify a broader examination. ( Struckler v. Teitz, 206 App. Div. 436.)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.