- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
McCULLOUGH v. CORPORATION
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mar 1, 1944
PER CURIAM.
In his petition for rehearing appellant has cited Kellogg No. 657,777, Hill No. 1,338,773, and Segelhorst No. 1,599,067 and No. 1,767,018 as being demonstrative of anticipation of Reilly-Stone No. 1,625,391. We do not find in these patents such anticipation.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge dissents.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.