- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
LAWS v. SKINNER
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action for overpayment of monthly rent instalments — Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 — Trial court found each overpayment separate offense — Fact found by court, not evidential but ultimate, when — Judgment for plaintiff for $550 and $150 attorney fee — Motion for new trial overruled — Appeal — Court of Appeals found all overpayments one offense — Ordered remittitur and rendered judgment for plaintiff for $50 and $150 attorney fee — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS, TURNER, INIATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.
Alert