- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SIEGEL v. GOODMAN
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Dec 21, 1945
MEMORANDUM
Per Curiam.
The complaint should have been dismissed at the end of plaintiff's case. Under section 33-c Pers. Prop. of the Personal Property Law, there could be no modification of the written agreement unless in writing.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
HAMMER, McLAUGHLIN and EDER, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.