MENG v. LUCASH

INSTRUCTIONS, § 20 — when instructions were not unnecessarily repetitious. Instructions given in personal injury action did not unnecessarily repeat and reiterate matters covered in other instructions, as alleged, since each of three instructions pertained to one of plaintiffs, each of whom stated respective separate causes of action in separate counts in complaint.

Opinion by JUSTICE BARTLEY.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed October 4, 1946; released for publication November 12, 1946.