- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF FRIEDLAND
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 7, 1947
Per Curiam.
An official referee has reported that the charges of misconduct set forth in the petition have been established by the petitioner. He pointed out, however, that there were mitigating circumstances. Although the evidence fully sustains the charges, we agree with the official referee that there were mitigating circumstances which warrant the conclusion that a censure is sufficient punishment.
The respondent should be censured.
MARTIN, P.J., GLENNON, DORE, COHN and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.
Respondent censured.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.