Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

COLEMAN v. STEWART

Supreme Court of California.In Bank.
Mar 31, 1949
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

THE COURT.

This case involves the legality and enforceability of privately imposed restrictions against occupation of a lot of land by non-Caucasians. The trial court enjoined occupance of the lot by defendants, non-Caucasians. Defendants appealed.

[1] Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. 1161, 3 A.L.R.2d 441] (see, also, Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. 1187]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed. (See Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844 [ 193 P.2d 742]; Cassell v. Hickerson (1948), 31 Cal.2d 869 [ 193 P.2d 743]; Davis v. Carter (1948), 31 Cal.2d 870 [ 193 P.2d 744]; In re Laws (1948), 31 Cal.2d 846 [ 193 P.2d 744]; Lippold v. Johnson (1948), 32 Cal.2d 892 [ 197 P.2d 161]; Clayton v. Wilkins (1948), 32 Cal.2d 895 [ 197 P.2d 162]; Morin v. Crane (1948), 32 Cal.2d 896 [ 197 P.2d 162].)

For the reason above stated the order appealed from is reversed.