- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
POTTER v. LEFEBVRE
Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.
Jun 7, 1949
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
If action is barred by the statute of limitations of the forum, no action can be maintained though action is not barred in the state where the cause of action arose.
PER CURIAM.
The ruling of the Trial Court was correct. The law upon this point is correctly stated in the Restatement, Conflict of Laws, s. 603, as follows: "If action is barred by the statute of limitations of the forum, no action can be maintained though action is not barred in the state where the cause of action arose." See also, Connecticut c. Co. v. Railroad, 78 N.H. 553, 555. The order, therefore, is
Exceptions overruled.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.