OHIO v. LAMORA

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Shooting with intent to wound or kill — Claim that court appointed inexperienced counsel to represent accused — Right to counsel — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Article VI, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is hereby ordered and decreed that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and TURNER, JJ., concur.