KAPLAN v. SESSLER

Per Curiam.

The maintenance of a television aerial or wire running from a window of respondents' apartments to the roof of the premises was, under the circumstances disclosed, an intrusion or squatting upon the landlords' property within the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act ( Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513, and reports therein cited; see, also, Joan Building Corp. v. Gould, 276 A.D. 765).

The final orders should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to landlords, and final orders directed for landlords as prayed for in the petitions.

STEINBRINK, RUBENSTEIN and COLDEN, JJ., concur.

Final orders reversed, etc.