SMITH v. GRAHAM

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent on the authority of Tyler v. Windels ( 186 App. Div. 698, affd. 227 N.Y. 589). We are not unmindful of the doctrine enunciated in Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Vol. 1, § 198, and particularly illustration 9 thereunder; N.Y. Ann. to Restatement, Contracts, § 198, p. 95); see also, Williston on Contracts (Vol. 2, Rev. ed., § 504, pp. 1469-1472).