- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF DIAMOND
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 2, 1951
Per Curiam.
Respondent admits that he improperly commingled funds of a client with his own funds. However, all money has now been properly accounted for by respondent who has been frank in his statements to the Grievance Committee of the Bar Association. The facts not being in dispute, there is no need of a reference of this matter. The court is of opinion that, in view of mitigating circumstances, a censure will be sufficient punishment.
The respondent should be censured.
PECK, P.J., GLENNON, DORE, COHN and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.
Respondent censured.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.