ROSENBERG v. FEIGIN

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.

Mar 26, 1952

Judgment

CaseIQ

HANSON, J. pro tem.

[1] The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a demurrer to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [ 114 P. 838]).

The appeal is dismissed.

White, P.J., and Doran, J., concurred.