- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ROSE v. ROSE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 23, 1953
Order unanimously reversed and the motion for discovery and inspection denied. We think the extraordinary remedy of discovery and inspection is unnecessary in the circumstances in this case. Application may be made for modification of the order for examination before trial so as to enable plaintiff to compel production of books and records before the referee named by Special Term, who will supervise the use of same for the limited purposes provided in section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. Settle order on notice.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.