Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. KADIO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Dec 22, 1953
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendant has been sentenced as a second offender, the Pennsylvania conviction being treated as the first felony. The County Court has dismissed a writ of error coram nobis addressed to the sufficiency of the Pennsylvania conviction to constitute a "crime", which in New York "would be" a felony. We think the record shows clearly that defendant was convicted of such a crime in Pennsylvania and that the court was right in dismissing the writ. The Pennsylvania indictment to which defendant pleaded guilty charged him with making an assault upon a person with intent to take property and then and there taking such property. The "crime" in Pennsylvania had a somewhat different name from that stated in the New York statute. It was there called "Robbery and Robbery by Assault and Force" (Pa. Penal Code, § 4704) and the statute uses different language to describe the crime. It constitutes as a crime the assaulting of a person with the intent to rob him, as well as robbing a person or stealing property from the person. This clearly is a felony in New York (Penal Law, § 2120) which provides that the taking of personal property "from the person" or "by means of force" is a felony. Order unanimously affirmed.