PEOPLE v. D'AULA

The motion was made on the ground that the court acted without jurisdiction when it accepted the plea, in that the plea was to a lesser degree of crime than charged in the indictment and it was accepted over the protest of the District Attorney and without submission by the District Attorney of a written statement of reasons for acceptance of such plea, and without the filing of such statement (see Code Crim. Pro., § 342-a). Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.