GREEN, ET AL. v. POOLE, ET UX

Karl Wiesenburg, Pascagoula, for appellants. I. The Chancery Court erred in finding that the lot described by metes and bounds in the amended bill of complaint, which description incorporated into the final decree, is identical with lot 112 of the plat made by Ralph Delmas, Surveyor, in the year 1927, and which plat is admittedly the only plat of the Orange Grove Cemetery Association subdivision from which lots were assigned. II. The Chancery Court erred in finding that sometime during the year 1945 the Orange Grove Cemetery Association assigned a portion of the lot claimed by Mr. and Mrs. Jim Poole to Ernest Green and wife, Lucille Green, when under the uncontradicted evidence that at no time was an assignment made to anyone of any part of any lot in said Orange Grove Cemetery Association subdivision. Collation of authorities: 10 Am. Jur., Cemeteries, Secs. 8, 10, 38, 39. Donald W. Cumbest, Watts Colmer, Pascagoula, for appellees. I. Cited and discussed the following authorities: Brown v. Hill, 284 Ill. 286, 119 N.E. 977; Sherrard v. Henry, 88 W. Va. 315, 106 S.E. 705, 21 L.R.A. 645; Wilkinson v. Strickland, 82 Miss. 709, 35 So. 177; 1 Am. Jur., Sec. 101 pp. 848, 867; 10 Am. Jur., Sec. 22 pp. 503-04, 514; 21 L.R.A. 97; 53 L.R.A. 729; Vol. VI, Cyc. of Law and Procedure, pp. 716-17.