- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DANDRIDGE v. UNITED STATES
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jul 8, 1957
PER CURIAM.
Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.
A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.